UGG Boots Sale Schematic diagram of the development process the incident

A Lei, who also contract for appraisal of the results showed that a contract is not filled out, the existence of altered behavior, there is no legitimacy: the warranty period The deadline is later added up, the amount of the guarantee from the

court issued shortly, in addition to an order Monmouth, London billion company debt, but also sub-Ah Lei, who jointly and severally liable.

the case for trial in the hospital,UGG Boots, A Lei, who commissioned a Justice of Guangzhou were identified. The first identification of the content of their signature on the contract, the contract for inspection in six, two were identified as non-signed by himself, and the remaining four people were identified as himself signed. While the two are optimistic about the proceedings, the Bank has made India the two men for identification of fingerprints, the results have been proved to be my fingerprints.

2008, the six Arab Lei, Zhongshan Municipal People's Procuratorate accordingly apply to the protest, the prosecution subsequently effective decision procedure law, the Zhongshan Hospital protest. The case was heard in the Court, in April 2009, Zhongshan City, the first people sent back to court for retrial. 24th of this month, the case was the second time in a hospital trial.

court during the trial, has been chairman of CAO had issued a statement that he did not organize the things people talked about loans, no organization for the company employees all family assets as collateral for loans, Bank also He did not verify the condition of the assets of these employees.

Coordinator: Southern Reporter Wenjie written: Southern Reporter Lu Jing Southern mapping: Zhang Jun Xu

anger: corporate debt affected individuals

2005 January,UGG Online, Guangzhou billion London Investment Limited (hereinafter referred to as But Monmouth was not immediately notify the bank, the bank then submitted its breach of contract, announced in advance to recover the loan.

11 24, the court before trial, Ah Lei about his life from the memorable scene: a few days before Christmas 2007, A Lei came home from work and found posted on the door from a court ruling, above, said his house has been sealed according to the law requiring 10 days to move out, or they will be auctioned or sold.

Schematic diagram of the development process the incident.

until August 31, 2005 the final payment deadline in the past, Monmouth's still not repaid the loans, the bank begins the account designated to go 370,000 deposit, and the other to repay its 2.62 million lawsuit . The defendant company in addition to Monmouth, London billion company, there are nine individuals also being sued jointly and severally liable, in addition to three company executives have a stake in the remaining six R & D personnel, only to receive wages in Monmouth.

surprise: real estate suddenly sealed by the court

3 years ago, Ah Lei (a pseudonym) in a new home along the King's house suddenly seized by the court! And he was working in a company of nine colleagues, are faced with the dilemma of their own house to be auctioned.

contract fingerprint is true

and Ah Lei's ruling also received nine people, all he OSK's old colleagues. Monmouth company established in 1998, the main business is the repeater, the development of a flourishing by 2001, A Lei introduced himself and several other employees are technical engineers, OSK, the company set up when entered.

2004 年 8 31, Monmouth, Zhongshan Branch of Bank of the company to borrow 3 million for a period of one year. Contract, OSK Property's event organization, legal representative of the change and other major changes, should notify the bank more than 7 days in advance.

To find out, Ah Lei, who found a September 2005 entry into force of the verdict, and found, to a former club of their involvement with the bank's debt.

2004 years ago, few people in the Arab Lei Shun King a new home, Blue Wave Bay, Yongyi Garden District, were loans to buy a house, two to three million or so in total. That is when, A Lei, who has to leave Monmouth. They never thought that the house has not paid off loans, it sealed by the court.

doubt: the key contract was forged?

A Lei, who read the verdict found that the bank put them to court, based on an Under the contract, the company and cross-line March 18, 2003 to March 18, 2005-debt relationship, Ah Lei and others to all the family assets to provide joint and several unlimited liability guarantees, the amount of $ 3.5 million.

however, Zhongshan Branch of Bank's attorney that the bank does not exist or altered motivation. Bank loans to a total of only 300 million, even if the guarantee amount is 300 million,UGG Boots Sale, or entirely within the lines, there is no need to

Ah Lei and others as the year the civil agency, Jun responded that the court summons was sent to the company, but Ah Lei, who are already resigned to Shenzhen, so there is no link to them. Other case to the Court, London billion company told him to send a representative of the individual defendants have come out, you come to appear before it, so he took part in the proceedings. The sign of the instruments, Jun said he did not understand the relevant legal provisions, rounds, one point of contention, when the signature on the guarantee contract is not signed by several employees I? There are no fake contract?

lawyers said, may not guarantee one completed, there Tianxie situation, but not altered, because Tianxie may be conducted prior to the seal, the two sides recognized.

why the 2005 hearing, the court summons is not sent to the hands of the defendants? Why is their legal right to represent the unity of the company? Company and Bank of the existence of collusion? A Lei and others thought of them shady.

Another Ah Lei, who let suspicions thing is that the first court case in 2005 when they did not appear Ah Lei, accept the court summons and participate in the proceedings, by Jun agent. In other words, a single case of 13 defendants,UGG Outlet, only two companies who appear in court defender and Jun 3. A Lei, who has no knowledge of the entire lawsuit.

contract fraud

Focus

A Lei roots bottom, only to find they are involved in a dispute with the bank's loans. In 2005, Ah Lei eight parties in the absence of the trial, their old club, Zhongshan City Wan Xin Electronics Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Strange that the Ah Lei, several employees have jointly and severally liable to the debt.

1 to be represented?

did not purchase, pay only a thousand or so, what guarantees?